Categories
uncategorized

More marriage news

Wow, same-sex marriage arrives in the township of New Paltz, N.Y.:

After making headlines in San Francisco and Massachusetts, the national debate over gay marriage migrated today to a smaller stage, the Hudson Valley community of New Paltz north of New York City, after [Mayor Jason] West said that he would officiate at marriage ceremonies for up to a dozen gay couples.

Cool. By the way, you know where I’ll be on Wednesday:

RALLY AGAINST DISCRIMINATION
Oppose the Federal Anti-Marriage Amendment

Corner of 17th and Rhode Island Ave. NW
Washington, D.C.
In front of the HRC Building

March 3, 2004 (Wednesday), 6:00 p.m.

Let’s rally together on the heels of President Bush’s endorsement to permanently deny marriage rights to same-sex couples! Rally to demonstrate your opposition to the Federal Anti-Marriage Amendment, and show your support for marriage rights for the gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender community!

Come out, come out, wherever you are! Lastly, this week’s Economist, in a cover story no less, makes its case for gay marriage (link via serendipity):

The Economist: The case for gay marriageThe case for allowing gays to marry begins with equality, pure and simple. Why should one set of loving, consenting adults be denied a right that other such adults have and which, if exercised, will do no damage to anyone else? Not just because they have always lacked that right in the past, for sure: until the late 1960s, in some American states it was illegal for black adults to marry white ones, but precious few would defend that ban now on grounds that it was “traditional.” Another argument is rooted in semantics: marriage is the union of a man and a woman, and so cannot be extended to same-sex couples. They may live together and love one another, but cannot, on this argument, be “married.” But that is to dodge the real question–why not?–and to obscure the real nature of marriage, which is a binding commitment, at once legal, social, and personal, between two people to take on special obligations to one another. If homosexuals want to make such marital commitments to one another, and to society, then why should they be prevented from doing so while other adults, equivalent in all other ways, are allowed to do so?

Categories
uncategorized

Like a diamond in the sky

Right now at work I’m reviewing a series of UN space committee documents submitted by member countries, reporting satellite launches and characteristics. Only recently did I realize that manmade satellites orbiting the earth number in the thousands. For some reason I always thought it was a lot less than that. And there’s a lot of debris floating around up there too.

Anyway, I found this sort of cute: last year the Czech Republic launched a satellite called MIMOSA (Micro-Measurements of Satellite Acceleration). Cool, but can it serve brunch too?

Categories
uncategorized

We the people: which people?

Ugh. I’m getting all worked up again, thinking about Bush and the FMA. Here’s just one thing (among many) about yesterday’s speech that gets me. He says, “On a matter of such importance, the voice of the people must be heard.”

Which people? News flash, Bush: homosexuals–if you can ever bring yourself to say the word–are people too. Listen to us! While you purport to speak for “the people,” you speak against me, the gay population, and all citizens who value equality. Rather than do the right thing and help guide the nation toward some kind of understanding on gay issues (I’ll keep dreaming), you further stigmatize a minority population. Uniter, divider, yeah, whatever.

Lastly I repeat from an earlier entry: he can couch this in terms of “protection” of marriage, but it is basically denial of marriage. Try changing that one word in his speech: “If we are to prevent the meaning of marriage from being changed forever, our nation must enact a constitutional amendment to” deny gays and lesbians the right of marriage “in America.” Not only does that discriminatory sentiment have no place in the Constitution, it has no place in America. Again, I’ll keep dreaming. And start fighting.

By the way, yesterday I put my money where my mouth is and became a member of the HRC. I’d been meaning to do so for a while, and if anything were to spur me to action, then boy, this is it.

Categories
uncategorized

Gay marriage cartoons

Great link, especially to counter reading this morning’s FMA announcement: have a laugh with twenty pages of political cartoons about gay marriage (via Beaverhausen).

Categories
uncategorized

No amends here

Well, our fool of a President has gone and done it: call for a constitutional amendment “protecting” (read denying) marriage. For once, I’m almost speechless. If you can stomach it, read this morning’s remarks. The glove has been thrown down, people. Bring it on.

Ugh, I’m going to take a walk. (Maybe I’ll keep going till I reach Canada?) I need some air.

Categories
uncategorized

The Exaggerator

First of all, a big ol’ yay for San Francisco. (Yes, I’m a bit late.) The day city officials began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, I talked with my mom on the phone. (My parents live in the Bay Area.) She told me that when she saw the news reports on TV, with all the couples at City Hall, especially the lesbian couple who had been together for more than fifty years, she thought, “Yeah, they should get married.” And the word she used to describe Mayor Gavin Newsom: “brave.” How encouraging. Go, mom.

[A few weeks ago, following the most recent court ruling in Massachusetts, she half-jokingly asked me if Thom and I were going to go up there and get married. Me: nervous laugh. Heh.]

On to Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. I’m going over the transcript from Sunday’s Meet the Press. Not a fun read, but if you’re looking for senseless hyperbole, boy, does he serve it up:

So we cannot have, all of a sudden now, mayors go and hand out licenses for various different things. If it is–you know, in San Francisco, it’s the license for marriage of same sex. Maybe the next thing is another city that hands out licenses for assault weapons. And someone else hands out licenses for selling drugs. I mean, we can’t do that.

Good lord. The slippery slope from equal rights to assault weapons and drugs?

Then it got to be a bigger issue and a bigger issue, and then yesterday, when I was in San Francisco for the Republican convention, all of a sudden we see riots and we see protests and we see people clashing. The next thing we know is there are injured or there are dead people, and we don’t want to have that.

And then later, in response to what he would do if the state legislature were to legalize gay marriage:

You know something? I don’t deal with hypotheticals. There’s so many problems that we have in our state of California now, financial problems, economic problems, and all this, I’m dealing much more with reality, not with hypotheticals.

Oh, I see. He can conjure up hypothetical drug and assault weapon licenses and hypothetical riot deaths if it means cracking down on gay marriage, but hypothetical legislation is not worth thinking about. One more thing:

I think this is all a legal matter now, and I directed Attorney General Bill Lockyer and said, you know, that he should now take care of this problem.

What does Lockyer, who himself believes same-sex marriage to be illegal under California law, have to say about being told what to do?

“The governor can direct the Highway Patrol. He can direct the next Terminator 4 movie if he chooses. But he can’t direct the attorney general in the way he’s attempted to do,” Lockyer said, adding that Schwarzenegger’s written directive “was a statement designed for consumption at the Republican convention.”

In a fax Friday night to the home of a Lockyer aide, the governor wrote: “I hereby direct you to take immediate steps to obtain a definitive judicial resolution of this controversy.” The message also said that San Francisco’s actions to wed gay couples “present an imminent risk to civil order.”

Lockyer called that statement “preposterous” and said it is the kind of “exaggerated, hot rhetoric” that risks stirring people up to commit hate crimes.

Exactly.

Categories
uncategorized

TiVo alert: farewell to the City

The Sex and the City series finale is tomorrow night. Eek! So sad. Well, this is just a note reminding you TiVo-ers that the two-part farewell special which precedes it at 8 p.m. is listed under a slightly different title, i.e., your Season Pass probably won’t catch it. So you’ll have to go in and manually set the TiVo to record.

Categories
uncategorized

New York valentine

Yeah, yeah, I know. I’ve been back in town since Monday night, and I haven’t posted until now, more than a week after I left. Actually I’ve been writing bits and pieces of this entry over the past couple of days. Since Thom already wrote an excellent, comprehensive review of our New York getaway (go read it if you haven’t already), I thought I was going to add just a few quick notes here, but once I got started, I kept writing and writing, and it slowly turned into the hulking mass that lies before you.

Enjoy. Or at least be kind and pretend.

Friday: We begin with the original raison d’être of our weekend escape: the Rufus show. Joan as Police Woman led the opening acts–her solo set was pretty good, but I would’ve liked to hear her songs with a band to back her up–and then came Kiki and Herb. They were a riot. Kiki ended their set singing the hell out of “Total Eclipse of the Heart,” which had me laughing so hard the whole time. Rufus was in top form. He looked and sounded fabulous. Some highlights: a new song called “The Art Teacher,” to be released on Want Two; “Greek Song” sung as a duet with Kiki; the entire band dressed in witch hats and capes for “Oh, What a World”; typically adorable Rufus moments like forgetting a phrase in “Foolish Love” and “L’Absence” (the latter by Berlioz, during which Rufus blurted, “Fuck!” and then a second later, “Berlioz didn’t write that part”); and the encore with Martha, “Nuits de Miami,” always a treat.

Saturday: Valentine’s Day! Thom and I had been listening to the Wicked cast recording on and off for months, so it was great to finally see it all come together. Our seats were at the rear of the orchestra, but the section is on enough of a slope that the view was fine. Everything about this show is amazing: the cast, sets, music, etc. Kristin Chenowith and Idina Menzel are perfect. Such energy. When Idina rises above the stage at the climax of “Defying Gravity,” it’s an awesome convergence of light and color and music. We’ll definitely see the show again sometime. (I was just reading the past two weeks’ Broadway grosses on Playbill, and Wicked attendance was at around 96%, a regular performance rate second only to The Producers for those weeks.)

After Wicked, we went gallery hopping in Chelsea. Our first stop was Gorney Bravin + Lee (by the way, the next day at the Cooper-Hewitt gift shop I came across an innocent looking, yet very opinionated book on typography that admonished people who use the plus sign like that, instead of the ampersand–which you see all the time in names of design firms–as having no sense of lettering), where we viewed a group exhibit called “Future Noir.” More notables: “Game Show” at James Cohen Gallery, whose front-window display is a ping-pong table painted black and white (patrons are encouraged to play; did you or I win, Thom?); and a series of large, dark and evocative photographs by Bill Henson at Robert Miller Gallery.

Back at the hotel, Thom surprised me with a couple of presents: a soft little heart-shaped door-hanger that says “stud muffin” on the front, with a zippered pouch full with candy hearts; and a book entitled Meet Me in the Bar: Classic Drinks from America’s Historic Hotels, in which he wrote a very sweet inscription. How darling!

Sunday: It was fun meeting Jeff and Matt (you read their blogs, don’t you? of course, you do, good reader), and chatting over lunch. Seriously, could they be any cuter?

Afterwards Thom and I walked to Footlight Records on East 12th Street, a great place for musical theater and vocal music, especially on vinyl. I’ve been there a couple of times on my trips to New York, and it turns out they no longer carry the Italian cast recording of Rent, which I’ve been meaning to get. Grr. Oh, well.

We had some time before our evening at the theater, so we made our way to the Guggenheim, my first time there. A few of the upper floors were closed, with the rotunda walls completely bare, which made the structure a lot more stark than one is used to from pictures. There was some great art on display in the galleries: Boccioni (a well put-together exhibit, which included lots of related paintings by various artists), Kandinsky, and Klee, in addition to works from the main collection, like Picasso and Gris (that’s one of his works, Fantômas, in the current Rebel Prince banner, above).

Avenue Q was a blast. Go see this show. Now. We sat up close, in the third row off to the side. The John Golden Theatre is a relatively small Broadway venue, perfect for a show like this whose main characters are puppets. My only tiny quibble was with some of the staging. Granted I’m not expecting Susan Stroman choreography meets Sesame Street, but what little there was seemed a little hokey. Other than that minor point, it was fantastic. Definite highlight: the super-cute and super-talented John Tartaglia, who plays Princeton and Rod. Can we take John home with us? Please?

Side note about the show: this isn’t a spoiler, but when the cast asks you to “give us your money,” do dig up some spare cash and throw it their way. Thom did, and got quite a flirtation from the Gary Coleman character. Heh. The Playbill notes that all donations received during the performance go to Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS.

Monday: What’s a trip to New York without some serious shopping? We checked out the Bluefly outlet on West 24th Street, where all items were reduced to $25. However, as you might expect, it was slim pickings, especially for men’s clothing. There were some fabulous finds for women, however, which makes me think I should figure out my hypothetical dress size and explore my drag persona, yes? The other highlight was the Barneys Co-op warehouse sale, which runs through the end of February. What a zoo. Actually, it was more like an underground club–queue at the door, crowded spaces, cute fellow patrons. Everything was at least 50% off, but at a place like Barneys that doesn’t exactly translate to cheap. I came across a lucious suede jacket for $750… marked down from $1500. Needless to say, I moved on. I did end up getting two sweaters (one cashmere, the other merino wool, both Barneys label) and an Arnold Zimberg black dress shirt with an embroidered design down the sleeves (which I wore to work the other day). Fabulous.